New York Menlo Park Washington DC São Paulo London |
Paris Madrid Tokyo Beijing Hong Kong |
Richard D. Truesdell, Jr.
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 |
212 450 4674 tel 212 701 5674 fax richard.truesdell@davispolk.com |
September 11, 2014
Re: | Affimed Therapeutics B.V. |
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form F-1 |
Filed September 8, 2014 |
File No. 333-197097 |
Mr. Jeffrey P. Riedler
Division of Corporation Finance
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549-3628
Dear Mr. Riedler,
On behalf of our client, Affimed Therapeutics B.V., a Dutch private company with limited liability (the Company), we are responding to the oral comments from the Staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) relating to the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197097, as amended, the Registration Statement) provided by the Staff on September 10, 2014. In conjunction with the filing of this letter today, we are filing an amendment to the Registration Statement with the changes noted in our response to comment number 1 below (the Amendment). We are also sending you, under separate cover, a copy of the Amendment and three sets of changed pages showing the changes in the Amendment from the previously filed Registration Statement.
Set forth below are the Companys responses to the Staffs comments. For convenience, the Staffs comments are repeated below in italics, followed by the Companys response to the comments.
Notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements
Note 3. Basis of preparation and changes to Groups accounting policies
Critical judgments and accounting estimates, page F-10
1. | We acknowledge response to comment 2. Please tell us why additional disclosure with respect to the information contained in this response is not warranted. See IFRS 13, specifically 93(d). In this regard please revise your disclosure to provide information similar to that in your response. |
Mr. Jeffrey P. Riedler Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
||||
2 | September 11, 2014 |
Response: |
We respectfully advise the Staff that IFRS 13, including its disclosure requirements applicable to interim financial statements, do not apply to share-based payment arrangements, see IFRS 13.6a. The preferred shares are carried at amortized cost rather than fair value; IFRS 13.93d applies to financial instruments measured at fair value. However, in response to your comment, we will enhance our disclosure by adding the information contained in our previous response to comment #2 as follows: | |
In the second quarter of 2014, in preparation of the IPO, information that is more representative of the fair value of the preferred shares became available, and the Company incorporated that information in the determination of the fair value of the preferred shares. The discounted cash flow model using a weighted average cost of capital formed the basis of the valuation; however, the Company adjusted the data because reasonably available information indicated that other market participants would consider additional data. Accordingly, the Company took into account such information, including the following: | ||
pricing feedback from potential investors; | ||
recent (Q2/2014) IPO valuations for peer companies; | ||
current market valuations for peer companies relative to their respective IPO valuations; | ||
the size and quality of the biotechnology and pharma IPO backlog; and | ||
feedback from the Companys existing shareholders. | ||
The preferred shares are not convertible into common shares based on their terms, and therefore the exchange must be negotiated between the Company and its shareholders. Thus, the Company prepared a term sheet for the exchange of the preferred shares into common shares and took into account input from such holders to the proposed terms. The resulting fair value applied in the interim financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2014 is based on the estimated valuation for an IPO and the terms of a contemplated exchange of preferred shares into common shares. The Company considers this valuation and the contemplated terms of exchange to be more reliable evidence of fair value of the preferred shares. |
2. | In addition, we did not note the reconciliation of the resulting fair value applied in the interim financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2014, that reconciles to the price range of the common shares of the Company presented in your preliminary prospectus filed on September 2, 2014 as noted in your response. Please provide us with that reconciliation. |
Mr. Jeffrey P. Riedler Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
||||
3 | September 11, 2014 |
Response: |
We respectfully advise that the reconciliation requested by the Staff is provided in Appendix A to this response letter. |
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (212) 450-4674, (212) 701-5674 (fax) or richard.truesdell@davispolk.com if you have any questions regarding the foregoing or if I can provide any additional information.
Very truly yours, |
/s/ Richard D. Truesdell, Jr. |
Richard D. Truesdell, Jr. |
cc: | Via E-mail |
Dr. Adi Hoess, Chief Executive Officer
Dr. Florian Fischer, Chief Financial Officer
Affimed Therapeutics B.V.
Appendix A
Reconciliation between the value of the Company (at the mid-point of the price range listed on the cover of the prospectus)
|
June 30, 2014 | ||||
Price per share (in USD) |
12.00 | |||
Shares outstanding (immediately prior to the offering) |
16.0 | |||
Equity Value pre-money (in USD millions) |
191.8 | |||
Equity Value pre-money (in EUR millions) |
140.1 | |||
Minus: Series E investment as disclosed in Registration Statement |
(8.2 | ) | ||
Equity Value allocable to Existing Instruments (before Series E financing round) |
131.9 | |||
Allocated to Existing Instruments |
||||
Common Shares |
1.0 | |||
Series D Preferred Shares, as disclosed on page F-10 |
118.1 | |||
Carve Out |
10.3 | |||
ESOP |
2.5 | |||
Total |
131.9 | |||
Fair Value Incentive Instruments after Discount for Lack of Marketability (DLOM) |
||||
Carve Out |
9.1 | |||
ESOP |
1.2 | |||
Fair value incentive instruments, as disclosed on page F-13 |
10.3 |